Comments on: SharePoint –Black Hole or Star of Your Business Universe?

By: data recovery

data recovery — Wed, 26 May 2010 14:00:31 +0000

If I would be able to access all my data at one point I think it would be really a time saver for me.

By: Arno Nel (SharePoint Magazine)

Arno Nel (SharePoint Magazine) — Tue, 05 May 2009 23:30:56 +0000

testing twitter integration with sharepointmagazine.net comments

By: Arno Nel (SharePoint Magazine)

Arno Nel (SharePoint Magazine) — Tue, 05 May 2009 23:29:26 +0000

testing twitter integration with sharepointmagazine.net comments

By: SPS Workflow

SPS Workflow — Fri, 01 May 2009 03:15:38 +0000

Julian,

I whole-heartedly agree with you on this. Large SharePoint installations may need human librarian to properly catalogue the data. SPS Workflow espouses the view that information should always run through a workflow before being excepted into the repository. At the end of the workflow, in the case of documents, images, etc, they should be sent to a librarian (or perhaps information architect) to be properly tagged (with tag selection provided at the beginning or at certain steps of the workflow).

By: Sharepoint Sceptic

Sharepoint Sceptic — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:16:00 +0000

some of things you pointed out – the complexity of sharepoint, the need to set up SQL – and other things – the costs of sharepoint, the need to set up in house servers – make it unsuitable from a small business perspective. it is not truly “out of the box”, since a non expert cannot implement or manage it. Web based SharePoint alternatives like HyperOffice are a better bet from an SMB perspective. These might not be as powerful as sharepoint, but bring the right balance of functionality, cost and ease of use from an SMB perspective.

By: TIGOS

TIGOS — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:04:41 +0000

Awsome article!

The File Server vs SQL Server is a big challenge to ITs, for many reasons (back and restore and others)

Thanks!