<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customizing the User Experience of SharePoint: Fast track to Feature Generation (Part 6 of 6)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6</link>
	<description>SharePoint Magazine is an online Magazine dedicated to the world of SharePoint</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bjørn Furuknap</title>
		<link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6/comment-page-1#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjørn Furuknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2691#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Hello,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Deploying lookup columns is a tricky business, but once you know why and how all it takes is a couple of lines of code. In short I ususally have a feature activated handler and hook up the columns on activation-time. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;.b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Deploying lookup columns is a tricky business, but once you know why and how all it takes is a couple of lines of code. In short I ususally have a feature activated handler and hook up the columns on activation-time. </p>
<p>.b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cal</title>
		<link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6/comment-page-1#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2691#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the series of posts - it&#039;s easy to read, and covers a lot of the core dev / deployment stuff :) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;d be interested in seeing how you have handled deployment of lookup fields, using the technique you have outlined here ... in my experience, things get a lot trickier; multiple interrelated GUID dependencies mean you would have to then deploy the &quot;looked-up&quot; list definition and instance, the lookup site column, and the content types which use these.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Have you found a way to simplify this?  Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the series of posts &#8211; it&#39;s easy to read, and covers a lot of the core dev / deployment stuff <img src='http://sharepointmagazine.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#39;d be interested in seeing how you have handled deployment of lookup fields, using the technique you have outlined here &#8230; in my experience, things get a lot trickier; multiple interrelated GUID dependencies mean you would have to then deploy the &#8220;looked-up&#8221; list definition and instance, the lookup site column, and the content types which use these.</p>
<p>Have you found a way to simplify this?  Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: furuknap</title>
		<link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6/comment-page-1#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>furuknap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2691#comment-716</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree, there are plenty of tools with similar capabilities. I prefer WSPBuilder for its VS integration, but each person&#039;s style and task is different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, for this article I wanted to explain a certain technique, not discuss the various tools available. As the technique used SPM and WSPBuilder I elaborated on the use of WSPBuilder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On that note, I have yet to see any single tool capable of performing the same CAML dump-&gt;Feature combo that WSPBuilder plus SPM can do. Most other tools, like VSeWSS, when it releases, perform a single task very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree, there are plenty of tools with similar capabilities. I prefer WSPBuilder for its VS integration, but each person&#39;s style and task is different.</p>
<p>However, for this article I wanted to explain a certain technique, not discuss the various tools available. As the technique used SPM and WSPBuilder I elaborated on the use of WSPBuilder.</p>
<p>On that note, I have yet to see any single tool capable of performing the same CAML dump-&gt;Feature combo that WSPBuilder plus SPM can do. Most other tools, like VSeWSS, when it releases, perform a single task very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jthake</title>
		<link>http://sharepointmagazine.net/technical/development/customizing-the-user-experience-of-sharepoint-fast-track-to-feature-generation-part-6-of-6/comment-page-1#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>jthake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharepointmagazine.net/?p=2691#comment-709</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s only fair to mention the other SharePoint Development Tools rather than just mentioning WSPBuilder, especially with the new features that VSeWSS 1.3 CTP has in it. For more information on comparing these tools, check out:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Solution+package+development+tool+comparisons&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s only fair to mention the other SharePoint Development Tools rather than just mentioning WSPBuilder, especially with the new features that VSeWSS 1.3 CTP has in it. For more information on comparing these tools, check out:<br /><a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public/Solution+package+development+tool+comparisons" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public.." rel="nofollow">http://www.sharepointdevwiki.com/display/public..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
